Regional protest

This type of protest calls for greater boldness and direct confrontation with the central government. In such a scenario, regions would organise protests not just to express grievances, but to actively protect their resources and influence how they are governed. This approach implies that a region must take the initiative to establish a common platform for progress and development, focusing on self-reliance and local empowerment.

In this context, I am not referring to regions attempting to display hollow supremacy or seeking ways to exploit the resources of the central government. Rather, I am advocating for regions that are prepared to harness their God-given resources and put them to constructive use. This involves taking responsibility for local development, rather than waiting for handouts from the centre.

Moreover, this approach implies that those elected to represent a region at the national level must be committed to advancing the developmental agenda of their region. Representatives who fail to embody these ideals should not expect to secure future votes. This is about holding leaders accountable to the people and ensuring that they serve the interests of regional progress rather than their own ambitions.

This is not about regional strategies designed to exploit the rest of the nation. Instead, it is about crafting regional strategies that unlock potential, both locally and internationally, for the benefit of the citizens. When regions focus on utilising their own resources effectively, it fosters healthy competition among regions. Rather than dragging each other down, regions that are lagging behind will feel the pressure to rise to the challenge and improve themselves, propelling the entire nation forward.

This model of regional advancement rejects the outdated approach of constantly begging the central government for assistance. It is based on the belief that each ethnic group and region within our nation has immense potential to build a world-class community and society. However, as long as we continue to look to the federal government for handouts, we will remain trapped in a cycle of dependence and underdevelopment.

Obafemi Awolowo’s Regional Development and Impact in Nigeria

Chief Obafemi Awolowo, a Nigerian statesman, politician, and nationalist, is widely remembered for his visionary leadership and the transformative impact he had on regional development in Nigeria, particularly in the Western Region during the pre-independence and early post-independence periods. As the Premier of the Western Region from 1954 to 1959, Awolowo implemented a series of groundbreaking policies that laid the foundation for modern development in the region and influenced the nation as a whole.

Vision for Regional Development

Awolowo’s approach to governance was rooted in his belief that regional development was crucial to the overall progress of Nigeria. He understood the unique challenges and opportunities that each region presented and tailored his policies to address the specific needs of the Western Region. His development agenda was centred on education, infrastructure, healthcare, industrialisation, and social welfare. Awolowo believed that these areas were the keys to unlocking the potential of the Western Region and driving economic and social progress.

Free Primary Education

One of Awolowo’s most significant contributions was the introduction of free primary education in the Western Region in 1955. This policy was revolutionary at the time and aimed at providing every child with access to basic education. The initiative dramatically increased school enrolment rates and literacy levels in the region, creating a generation of educated citizens who would go on to contribute to the region’s development.

This bold step in education set the Western Region apart from other regions in Nigeria, which had yet to prioritise mass education. Awolowo’s emphasis on education established the Western Region as a leader in intellectual and professional development, producing a high number of doctors, lawyers, engineers, and civil servants who played pivotal roles in Nigeria’s development.

Infrastructure Development

Awolowo understood the importance of infrastructure in fostering economic growth. Under his leadership, the Western Region saw significant investments in road construction, electricity, and communication systems. His government developed an extensive road network that connected rural areas to urban centres, facilitating trade and movement of goods and services. The construction of the Cocoa House in Ibadan, the first skyscraper in West Africa, was a testament to Awolowo’s commitment to modernising the region’s infrastructure and promoting regional pride.

Healthcare

In healthcare, Awolowo’s administration built hospitals, health centres, and clinics across the Western Region, making healthcare accessible to both urban and rural populations. His government focused on preventive healthcare, with campaigns aimed at controlling diseases such as smallpox, malaria, and tuberculosis. By improving healthcare infrastructure and accessibility, Awolowo contributed to a significant improvement in the overall health and well-being of the people in the region.

Industrialisation and Economic Empowerment

Awolowo’s vision for economic development included a strong focus on industrialisation. He encouraged the establishment of industries in the Western Region to reduce dependence on agriculture and create employment opportunities. His administration invested in several industrial projects, including textile mills, cement factories, and agricultural processing plants. These industries not only provided jobs but also stimulated economic growth and diversification in the region.

Cocoa farming, the region’s main agricultural activity, received significant support under Awolowo’s leadership. The Western Region Marketing Board, established by his administration, helped stabilise cocoa prices, ensuring that farmers received fair compensation for their produce. The revenue generated from cocoa exports was reinvested into the region’s development, funding education, infrastructure, and social welfare programs.

Social Welfare

Awolowo’s government was also a pioneer in social welfare policies. He introduced free healthcare for children under the age of 18 and the elderly, as well as free and subsidised housing for low-income families. His administration’s commitment to social welfare ensured that the benefits of development were shared across all segments of society, particularly the most vulnerable.

Impact and Legacy

The impact of Awolowo’s regional development policies in the Western Region was profound and enduring. By prioritising education, infrastructure, healthcare, and industrialisation, Awolowo transformed the region into a model of development in Nigeria. The Western Region became a leader in literacy, economic prosperity, and social welfare, setting a standard that other regions aspired to follow.

Awolowo’s approach to governance demonstrated that regional development, when done with vision and purpose, could uplift an entire society. His legacy continues to inspire leaders in Nigeria and beyond, as he remains a symbol of selfless service, visionary leadership, and a deep commitment to the welfare of the people.

Even after his tenure as Premier, Awolowo’s influence on national politics and development remained significant. He played a critical role in the post-independence era, advocating for federalism and equity among Nigeria’s regions. His ideas on governance, economic development, and social justice continue to resonate in discussions about Nigeria’s future.

Chief Obafemi Awolowo’s regional development initiatives in the Western Region had a lasting impact on Nigeria. His policies laid the foundation for economic prosperity, social equity, and intellectual growth, positioning the Western Region as a leader in development within Nigeria. Awolowo’s legacy is a testament to the power of visionary leadership and the importance of regional development in shaping the future of a nation.

The Need for Visionary Leadership

Lastly, no protest can succeed without leadership that inspires and unites. Leaders who promote positive thinking, foster a mental shift, and encourage new ways of approaching challenges are crucial. In places like Rwanda, after the devastation of the genocide, it was visionary leadership that steered the nation towards reconciliation and development. The Rwandan government’s focus on unity, education, and innovation has transformed the country into a beacon of hope and progress in Africa.

Nigeria, too, needs leaders who can inspire a mental shift away from corruption and cynicism towards hope and possibility. Leaders who understand that the power to change the nation lies in the hands of the people, and who encourage citizens to take active roles in shaping their future.

The protest I am advocating is not one of mere resistance, but one of transformation. It is a protest that begins with the mind—a shift in thinking that leads to action. By adopting systemic protests that combine civil disobedience, economic pressure, education, and visionary leadership, we can create the change we wish to see. Waiting for corrupt leaders to act in our best interest is futile. The power to transform Nigeria lies within its people, and it is up to us to design protests that lead to real, sustainable change.

Mind Transformation, Education and Advocacy as Protest

Education is another powerful tool in this new protest design. When people are informed, they are empowered to make better choices and demand accountability. Across the world, education-based protests have led to significant reforms. In the United States, for instance, movements like the Civil Rights Movement were grounded in the education and empowerment of oppressed communities. Leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. understood that knowledge is power, and that an informed populace could challenge unjust systems more effectively.

In Nigeria, a protest rooted in education would involve raising awareness about citizens’ rights, informing people about how government works, and providing tools for civic engagement. This could take the form of workshops, online campaigns, and community gatherings where citizens are taught how to hold their leaders accountable. Knowledge spreads quickly, and as more people become aware of their power, the foundation for a more just and equitable society is laid.

The first pillar of any durable and effective protest is mental transformation—reshaping how we think and act. The collective mindset and actions of a nation significantly determine its destiny. To drive lasting change, we must disseminate thought-provoking content that not only informs but also inspires. Through deliberate efforts, protest leaders can nurture a new national consciousness, ultimately leading to the birth of a rejuvenated nation.

Without this crucial first stage, protests and agitations are likely to fall into the hands of malevolent forces. Without a structured form of education or ideological discipleship, various individuals, each with their own objectives and methods, can easily hijack a movement. This lack of unity and focus often leads to chaos, confusion, and an eruption of rage, rather than constructive change.

This brings us to the critical issue of education. No nation can rise above the quality of its education. A society’s intellectual fabric is directly linked to the quality of its educational system, and when that fabric weakens, the whole nation suffers.

I recall a conversation I had some time ago with a friend about how the standards of examinations have been lowered to accommodate weaker performances. By doing so, we have inadvertently undermined the integrity of our educational system, diluting its effectiveness and the competency of our graduates.

Years ago, a new educational body was established to assist students from less advantaged regions in passing their school-leaving exams. Although well-intentioned, this led to students achieving impressive results with far less effort than expected, allowing them to outshine students from the older educational body that were once renowned for their rigorous academic standards.

In response, the older institution, which many in the older generation fondly refer to as “Baba Yaba,” was forced to lower their own standards to remain competitive. This has created a dangerous trend where the value of hard work and dedication has been diminished. Today, it is almost seen as taboo to tell a child to “study hard,” as there seems to be an expectation of miraculous results without much effort.

As we witness the degradation of our educational system, it is increasingly clear that waiting for the government to step in and standardise education is not a viable solution. Instead, individuals and communities must take the initiative to create platforms that nurture the great minds and leaders of tomorrow. This can be done through both conventional and unconventional means, whether by establishing private educational institutions, creating mentorship programmes, or leveraging digital platforms to reach a wider audience.

The quality of education we provide will ultimately determine the calibre of citizens and leaders our nation produces. As the saying goes, as we think, so we are. If we fail to invest in mind transformation and education, we will continue to face the same societal challenges year after year.

By protesting against poor education and raising platforms to correct this, we can begin to solve many of the myriad issues our nation faces. Our collective thinking, shaped by the quality of education and mental transformation we pursue, will ultimately give birth to the nation we will live in. It is within our power to create a future where inspired, well-educated, and progressive citizens lead the way to a brighter tomorrow.

Global Perspectives to the Benefits of Mind Shift

To transform a nation, it is essential to invest in quality education, inspire positive thinking, and foster a mental shift towards progressive ideas. Throughout history, various global communities have achieved remarkable transformations by embracing these values and moving towards innovative approaches.

Quality education plays a fundamental role in shaping the future of any nation. Finland, for example, is globally renowned for its exceptional education system. Through prioritising teacher quality, equal access to education, and a focus on creativity rather than rote learning, Finland has created a highly educated and innovative workforce. This educational reform did not just improve individual prospects but transformed the entire nation into a hub of technological advancement and innovation.

Similarly, South Korea’s economic transformation is a reflection of the power of education. In the 1960s, South Korea was one of the poorest countries in the world, but through investing heavily in education, it has become one of the world’s largest economies. The country’s emphasis on science, technology, and engineering education has driven its rapid industrialisation and made it a leader in electronics and automotive industries.

Positive thinking and mental shifts also play a significant role in nation-building. Rwanda, once ravaged by genocide, is an example of how a nation can rebuild itself through a collective mental shift. After the 1994 genocide, Rwanda embraced a forward-looking mindset, focusing on reconciliation, unity, and development. The government implemented policies that promoted education, women’s empowerment, and technological innovation. Today, Rwanda is one of Africa’s fastest-growing economies, with its capital, Kigali, often cited as one of the cleanest and most orderly cities on the continent.

Inspiration from visionary leadership can also spark national transformation. Singapore’s rise from a small, underdeveloped nation to a global economic powerhouse under the leadership of Lee Kuan Yew is a prime example. Lee’s vision for Singapore was built on the pillars of education, disciplined governance, and embracing globalisation. By encouraging Singaporeans to adopt a growth mindset and pushing for continuous learning and skills development, Singapore transformed itself into a major financial and trading centre within a few decades.

New ways of thinking have also contributed to national transformations. In Costa Rica, a radical shift towards environmental sustainability and eco-tourism has led to significant economic growth while protecting the nation’s rich biodiversity. In 1948, Costa Rica made a bold decision to abolish its military and redirect those funds into education and environmental conservation. This new way of thinking led Costa Rica to become a global leader in sustainability and eco-friendly tourism, driving economic growth and social development while preserving its natural resources.

These examples illustrate that by prioritising quality education, fostering positive thinking, and embracing new ideas, nations can create lasting change. It requires a collective mental shift towards innovation, inspiration, and resilience to achieve transformation. When communities invest in the minds and spirits of their people, the possibilities for progress are boundless.

ADAPTING NON-VIOLENT PROTEST TO DRIVE DEVELOPMENT

Before launching a protest, it is essential to thoroughly understand the context, environment, and the most effective framework for ensuring the desired outcome. Protesting should not simply be about marching on the streets to gain the attention of the government; rather, it should evolve into a more strategic and multifaceted approach to addressing issues like bad governance and societal ills. When we consider protests that truly make a difference, we need to look beyond the act of moving from one street to another. Marching has its place, but it cannot be the sole or final solution—it must be a part of a broader strategy. If you believe that marching alone will bring about far-reaching and sustainable changes, you are simply deceiving yourself.

The true success of a protest lies in the unity and determination of the people, as well as their ability to persist for months or even years until their goals are achieved. In Nigeria, for instance, many of our challenges, as discussed in my book The Game Changer for National Transformation, stem from a need for mind transformation and empowerment. The book itself is a kind of protest against the old institution of governance that is counterproductive. By addressing these issues, we can significantly reduce problems such as ethnic biases, corruption, lack of productivity, religious intolerance, division, and more. Ultimately, when the mindsets of the people shift, the laws and policies of the land will naturally evolve to reflect the predominant values of the nation.

Given that the central government has been weakened by corruption and underperformance, now is the time to raise clusters of empowered and informed individuals and groups who can gradually reshape the political landscape from their end, no effort is too small. This calculated and structured approach is a form of protest in itself—a protest of action and change rather than mere words. It highlights the need to move beyond the old methods of carrying placards and chanting slogans against bad leadership. Instead, we must build a sustainable and durable structure of protest that can endure over time and truly make a difference.

The most powerful protest is one where you invest in yourself, create the life you desire, and protect that freedom. In many third-world countries, traditional protests can be dehumanising, often reducing citizens to a state of helplessness, as though they are begging the government for handouts. By giving too much power and relevance to the government, citizens unknowingly weaken their own authority, while simultaneously emboldening leaders to act with impunity. Autocratic and oppressive governments may even prefer when people take to the streets, as it reinforces their perception of control over a desperate populace.

True protest, however, is about letting the government know, with absolute certainty, that if they fail to fulfil their duties, you will take action to hold them accountable. It is about building a strong foundation within yourself and your community, one that is resilient and capable of driving lasting change. Protests that endure and lead to transformation are not just about public demonstrations—they are about reshaping the entire societal landscape from within, through empowerment, education, and a collective shift in consciousness.

Specific Areas to Build Subliminal Protest

In our context, let’s redefine protest as a way of resisting unfavourable and adversarial circumstances— a means of saying “no” to bad leadership without resorting to violence or destructive behaviour.

Consider this simple analogy to illustrate the concept of subliminal protest: An elderly business owner hires a young graduate into his firm. This young man, through hard work and dedication, helps the company grow significantly, contributing to its increased profits. Yet, despite his efforts, the business owner repeatedly refuses to increase the young man’s salary. Each time the young employee asks for a raise, he is met with threats of dismissal. This cycle continues for an extended period, leaving the young man frustrated and undervalued.

Eventually, the young man realises that his potential and earnings will always be limited in that company, no matter how much he contributes. So, instead of continuing to struggle for recognition, he decides to leave and start his own business. In a short time, he achieves tremendous success and becomes financially independent. This, to me, is a superior form of protest—quietly and purposefully removing oneself from an oppressive situation and carving out a new path.

The more common form of protest, particularly in less developed regions, involves the low-paid employee responding with anger—going on strike, or in more extreme cases, damaging company property. This reaction may provide momentary relief or expression of frustration, but ultimately, it is counterproductive. By destroying the tools and resources of the organisation, the individual not only hampers their own progress but also diminishes the overall potential for growth and development within the community. This is the same thing many of us are doing in the name of protests.

What I am advocating in this book mirrors the approach of the young man who, instead of creating a scene, quietly left the company and started his own venture. He achieved freedom without harming others or tearing down the structures around him. This kind of subliminal protest is a form of empowerment—it represents the ability to pursue the life you desire without being held back by external forces and without negatively impacting those around you. True freedom comes when you are mentally unshackled, and no longer reliant on oppressive systems for your well-being.

It’s crucial to understand that those who believe they cannot live a quality life without the support of the government will continue to be oppressed by that very government, even though it is supposed to provide them with protection and aid. I’m not suggesting that government is irrelevant—far from it. However, the extent to which a government is useful to you depends on your mindset and how you position yourself in relation to it.

This idea is comparable to marriage: your spouse can only enhance who you already are. If you are temperamental, angry, or possess a turbulent nature, no matter how supportive your spouse is, they cannot truly help you until you work on yourself and change from within.

As Shakespeare wisely said, “There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.” The way we perceive our circumstances shapes our reality. If we can shift our mindset and embrace subliminal protest, we can transcend the limitations imposed by bad leadership and oppressive systems, and ultimately achieve the freedom and success we desire.

Protest, When Corruption is the Order

In discussing the nature of protest, I propose a carefully designed form of protest that, if diligently followed, could lead to the achievement of meaningful and sustainable objectives. Protests, when properly organised and strategically implemented, can serve as powerful catalysts for change. However, in the context of Nigeria, relying solely on government intervention is a recipe for perpetual stagnation. The reality is that waiting for the Nigerian government, as it currently operates, is akin to waiting indefinitely without achieving anything substantive.

Nigeria is a nation where leaders often borrow money from the international community only to squander it on frivolities and personal gain. These funds, intended for national development, are frequently misappropriated, enriching a few while leaving the majority of citizens to bear the burden of debt. It is disheartening to witness this pattern of borrowing with the sole intention of looting, an act that epitomises the corrupt mindset of those in power. These leaders, driven by greed and a lack of vision, are incapable of fostering the transformation and growth that Nigeria so desperately needs. This has been the case for years, with no significant change in sight.

We must ask ourselves: what kind of leadership borrows money, not to uplift the nation, but to indulge in excess while the citizens suffer the consequences? It is clear that we cannot depend on such leadership for the progress of our country. Therefore, it is imperative that we, as citizens, take matters into our own hands, adopting a new approach to protest that transcends the traditional methods.

What I am proposing here is not just any form of protest, but a well-thought-out, systemic protest that has the potential to drive real change. This is not about taking to the streets in the same way we have done in the past. While street protests have their place, they are often reactive and, at times, easily co-opted or suppressed by those in power. Instead, we need a protest design that goes beyond mere expressions of dissatisfaction.

A Systemic Approach to Protest

The new form of protest must be strategic, targeting the very structures that uphold the status quo. It should be a protest rooted in constructive disruption—an approach that combines civil disobedience with community-driven initiatives aimed at growth and development. The goal is to create a movement that forces those in power to reckon with the collective will of the people, while simultaneously building alternative systems that promote better living conditions for the populace.

For example, consider the power of economic protests. In countries like South Africa, where inequality and corruption have long been issues, coordinated economic protests such as boycotts have been used to exert pressure on businesses and government. By refusing to support industries or companies that benefit from corrupt practices, citizens can disrupt the flow of money that sustains corrupt leaders. In Nigeria, this could translate into targeted boycotts of products or services linked to government contracts or companies known to engage in unethical practices. When large numbers of people refuse to participate in a corrupt economy, it sends a powerful message that can lead to change.

Another form of systemic protest could focus on building alternative structures within communities. In India, the concept of self-reliance, or “swadeshi,” was central to the Indian independence movement led by Mahatma Gandhi. Rather than depending on British goods and institutions, Indians were encouraged to create and support local industries and practices. This not only weakened the colonial power’s grip on the country but also fostered a sense of empowerment and pride among the people. Similarly, in Nigeria, citizens can start building local economies, support small businesses, and create self-sufficient communities that are less reliant on corrupt government structures which is becoming more irresponsible to the yearnings of the citizens by the day.

The nonviolent approaches of Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi shared several key characteristics, which made their movements highly effective in achieving social and political change. Below are the primary characteristics of their nonviolent approaches:

1. Moral and Ethical Foundation

Gandhi: Gandhi’s philosophy of Satyagraha was rooted in the belief that non-violence was morally superior to violence. He believed that truth and justice would prevail when the oppressed maintained moral high ground through nonviolent resistance. Without morality in our pursuit we become worse than the oppressor.

King: Inspired by Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr. also emphasized the moral and ethical dimension of nonviolence. For King, nonviolent protest was not just a tactic, but a way of life that adhered to Christian principles of love, forgiveness, and justice.

2. Civil Disobedience

Gandhi: Gandhi advocated for civil disobedience as a way to peacefully resist unjust laws. This included boycotts, non-cooperation, and public acts of defiance, such as the Salt March in 1930, where Indians defied British laws by producing their own salt.

King: Similarly, King encouraged civil disobedience against discriminatory laws in the United States. The Montgomery Bus Boycott and sit-ins at segregated lunch counters were examples of peaceful acts of resistance that defied unjust laws without resorting to violence.

3. Patience and Persistence

Gandhi: Gandhi understood that non-violent resistance required immense patience and persistence. He encouraged his followers to endure suffering and remain committed to non-violence, even in the face of brutal repression. An overnight protest often lead to destruction of life and properties.

King: King also believed that change would not happen overnight and that persistence was key. His commitment to non-violence was unwavering, even when civil rights activists were met with violent opposition. He taught that enduring hardship with dignity would eventually lead to victory.

4. Mass Mobilisation

Gandhi: Gandhi’s non-violent approach involved mobilising large segments of the Indian population. He united people across religious, caste, and regional lines in mass movements that included boycotts, strikes, and protests.

King: King successfully mobilised African Americans and their allies in mass protests, such as the March on Washington in 1963 and the Selma to Montgomery marches in 1965. He believed that the strength of non-violent resistance lay in the collective action of ordinary people.

5. Appeal to the Oppressor’s Conscience

Gandhi: Gandhi’s non-violent approach sought to appeal to the conscience of the British rulers by demonstrating the moral superiority of non-violence over colonial oppression. He believed that this would eventually force the oppressors to reconsider their actions. To dislodge the oppressor, the oppressed should be better than the oppressor.

King: King also sought to awaken the moral conscience of the nation, particularly white Americans. He believed that non-violent resistance would expose the inherent injustice of segregation and racism, compelling oppressors and bystanders alike to confront their own values.

6. Focus on Love and Forgiveness

Gandhi: Gandhi believed in the power of love (ahimsa) as a force for change. He urged his followers to forgive their oppressors and to resist the temptation of hatred and revenge, even when facing violence.

King: Similarly, King preached love and forgiveness as central to his philosophy of non-violence. He encouraged his followers to love their enemies and to remain peaceful, even when provoked. His famous statement, “Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that,” encapsulates this principle.

7. Constructive Programme

Gandhi: Gandhi’s approach to non-violence also included a constructive programme, which focused on building self-reliance within the oppressed communities. This involved initiatives such as promoting local industries, improving sanitation, and educating the masses, empowering people to live with dignity even under colonial rule.

King: While King’s focus was primarily on dismantling segregation and achieving civil rights, he also emphasised the importance of improving the socio-economic conditions of African Americans through education, employment, and housing opportunities.

8. Peaceful Demonstrations

Gandhi: Gandhi organised numerous peaceful marches and protests, where participants were instructed to remain non-violent, even in the face of police brutality. The Salt March, for example, was a peaceful demonstration against British salt taxes.
King: King led peaceful marches and demonstrations as well, such as the March on Washington and the Birmingham Campaign. He believed that these non-violent demonstrations were powerful symbols of resistance that could bring attention to the injustices being fought.

9. Empowerment of the Oppressed

Gandhi: Gandhi’s non-violent philosophy empowered the Indian people by showing them that they could resist British colonial rule without resorting to violence. His approach gave the oppressed a sense of agency and dignity.

King: King empowered African Americans to stand up for their rights and to demand equality through non-violent means. His leadership instilled a sense of pride and confidence in those who had long been marginalised.

In summary, the non-violent approaches of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. were characterised by moral and ethical foundations, civil disobedience, patience and persistence, mass mobilisation, an appeal to the oppressor’s conscience, love and forgiveness, constructive programmes, peaceful demonstrations, and the empowerment of the oppressed. These characteristics enabled them to lead successful movements that brought about significant social and political change without resorting to violence.


Further Thoughts

Bad leaders and bad citizens are closely intertwined. To eliminate poor leadership, we need statesmen who can help cultivate new values. This is why those of us who desperately desire change must take responsibility and begin that change within ourselves. When we do, our advancing thoughts and actions will cleanse the bad elements in government. However, if we choose only to complain and whine, the cycle of regression will persist.

Reflect on this: why have so many protests and acts of activism in the past failed to bring about lasting change? The reality is that protest without virtue and purpose often leads to chaos and anarchy, rather than progress.

Examples of Failed Protests

1. The Arab Spring in Egypt (2011): The uprising in Egypt, part of the larger Arab Spring movement, initially seemed to promise democracy and freedom. However, after the removal of President Hosni Mubarak, the subsequent leadership was plagued by instability and conflict. Despite widespread protests, the country ultimately saw a return to military rule under Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, leaving many of the protesters’ aspirations unfulfilled.

2. Occupy Wall Street (2011): The Occupy movement, which protested against economic inequality and the influence of corporations in politics, gained significant attention globally. Despite the powerful message and large-scale participation, the movement lacked clear objectives and leadership, which led to its eventual disintegration without achieving significant political or economic reform.

3. The Hong Kong Protests (2019-2020): The pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, aimed at opposing China’s encroachment on the region’s autonomy, garnered international attention. Despite the prolonged efforts and widespread support, the Chinese government responded with crackdowns, and the protest movement ultimately failed to secure the democratic freedoms it sought.

4. The French Yellow Vest Movement (2018-2019): Initially sparked by fuel tax hikes, the Yellow Vest protests in France quickly grew into a broader movement against inequality and government policy. However, despite the intensity of the demonstrations, the movement failed to produce substantial change, largely due to its lack of centralised leadership and cohesive demands.

5. The 2009 Iranian Green Movement: Following disputed presidential elections, millions of Iranians took to the streets to protest electoral fraud and demand political reform. The protests were met with a brutal government crackdown, and the movement was effectively crushed without achieving any of its primary goals, leaving the country’s authoritarian structure intact.

These examples show us that protest alone is not enough to foster lasting change. A movement without moral foundation and clear direction risks dissolving into disorder, leaving the status quo intact.

The most effective protest against bad leadership is when you and I choose to live with integrity and step forward to lead by example. When we stand up and embody the values we wish to see, we shine a light that can guide others. And when the light shines, darkness must fade away. True and lasting change begins with us.

I will not hesitate to say that a single individual, well-intentioned and focused, can ignite the kind of protest that brings about transformative results for an entire nation. A prime example of this is Mahatma Gandhi, who united the people of India into a single, cohesive force that ultimately led to their independence. The success of the Indian independence movement was rooted in a clear vision of what the people wanted, and their unwavering focus allowed them to achieve it.

Gandhi’s use of non-violence, or Satyagraha, was a revolutionary approach to protest. Despite the British Empire’s stronghold on India, Gandhi inspired an entire nation to pursue freedom through peaceful means. The British, known for their might and unwillingness to relinquish control, found themselves unable to maintain their grip on a nation driven by a unified and peaceful resistance. Gandhi’s vision was not tainted by personal gain, ethnic biases, or political ambition. His approach remained pure, focused solely on the betterment of the nation as a whole. This purity of purpose made it impossible for people of vice to hijack the movement, as it was rooted in selflessness and a collective desire for transformation.

It is crucial to understand that the people around you can sense whether your intentions are genuine or self-serving. If your purpose is flawed or selfish, it will be incredibly difficult to achieve the good you seek. This is why Gandhi’s movement succeeded—his intentions were transparent, and his message resonated with millions. His focus was not on personal power, but on liberation for all.

In this vein, we can look to another iconic figure who successfully led a non-violent movement: Martin Luther King Jr. Although a Baptist pastor, King was wise enough to learn from Gandhi, a leader with different religious beliefs, in order to achieve his own goals. King recognised that success often leaves clues, and he modelled his campaign after Gandhi’s non-violent approach. The Civil Rights Movement in the United States, led by King, became a beacon of peaceful resistance, advocating for justice, equality, and the end of segregation.

Both Gandhi and King have left enduring legacies that the world continues to learn from. Their non-violent approaches are arguably the most potent tools for transforming societies burdened by oppressive leadership, injustice, and discrimination. History shows that power is seldom handed over easily or willingly, and governments often resort to excessive force to suppress protests. Sadly, lives are sometimes lost in these struggles. However, the ultimate lesson remains: non-violence is the most effective means of achieving lasting change.

Consider the case of apartheid in South Africa. The struggle against this brutal system was initially marked by violence and bloodshed. Despite the people’s righteous anger, these tactics failed to bring about the change they sought. It wasn’t until Nelson Mandela, after years of imprisonment, adopted a strategy of reconciliation and non-violence that true progress was made. Mandela’s ability to bring together those who had caused suffering and those who had suffered is a testament to the power of peaceful protest. His leadership not only secured independence from apartheid but also laid the groundwork for a unified nation. Mandela’s journey to freedom was long and arduous, yet when he finally emerged from prison, he extended his hand in peace to the very people who had oppressed him.

The lesson here is that, despite the inevitable tension between governments and the people, non-violence must remain at the core of any protest. Non-violent resistance has the unique ability to garner widespread acceptance, consideration, and support from the international community. The more a government tries to suppress a peaceful movement, the more legitimacy and support that movement gains.

Even global powers cannot resist the force of a people committed to peace and love. We can turn to the life of Jesus Christ as the ultimate example of this principle. In the midst of suffering and death, Jesus uttered the words, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” His crucifixion did not extinguish His message. Instead, the power of love resurrected His teachings, spreading them across the world.

No one can kill the message of a non-violent crusader, and no one can extinguish the message of love.

When your purpose is righteous and your intention is to make the world a better place, no one can stand in your way. God Himself blesses those who are peacemakers, those who bring light into the world. So, be that light. History shows that the most reasonable and lasting changes come through peace, and through aligning our efforts with a vision of a better, more abundant world for all.

Non violent approach and how it helped Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King junior and Nelson Mandela to achieve their aims

Non-violent resistance, also known as civil disobedience or nonviolent protest, has been a powerful tool in achieving social and political change. Three of the most prominent figures who successfully employed this approach were Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Nelson Mandela. Each of these leaders faced immense challenges in their struggles for justice, yet they remained committed to non-violence, ultimately leading to profound and lasting change.

Mahatma Gandhi: The Architect of Nonviolent Resistance

Mahatma Gandhi is perhaps the most iconic figure associated with non-violent resistance. He developed and popularised the concept of Satyagraha, which means “truth force” or “soul force.” Gandhi believed that non-violence was the most effective way to achieve social and political objectives. His philosophy was grounded in the belief that the moral power of non-violence would eventually overcome the physical force of the oppressors.

Gandhi’s non-violent approach played a crucial role in India’s struggle for independence from British colonial rule. One of the most famous examples of his non-violent resistance was the Salt March of 1930, where Gandhi led thousands of Indians on a 240-mile march to the Arabian Sea to protest the British monopoly on salt. This act of civil disobedience captured the world’s attention and galvanised the Indian independence movement. Gandhi’s steadfast commitment to non-violence inspired millions and eventually led to India’s independence in 1947.

Martin Luther King Jr.: Non-Violence and the Civil Rights Movement

Martin Luther King Jr. was deeply influenced by Gandhi’s principles of non-violence and applied them to the American civil rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s. King believed that non-violent protest was not only a moral imperative but also a practical strategy for achieving racial equality in the United States.

One of the most significant examples of King’s non-violent approach was the Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955-1956. Sparked by Rosa Parks’ arrest for refusing to give up her seat to a white passenger, the boycott lasted over a year and led to a Supreme Court ruling that segregation on public buses was unconstitutional. King’s leadership during this period demonstrated the power of peaceful protest and non-violent resistance in challenging systemic racism.

King’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech during the March on Washington in 1963 further highlighted the power of non-violence. His call for equality and justice resonated deeply with Americans of all backgrounds and helped to bring about significant legislative changes, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. King’s unwavering commitment to non-violence earned him the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 and cemented his legacy as a champion of human rights.

Nelson Mandela: From Armed Struggle to Reconciliation

Nelson Mandela’s journey towards non-violence was more complex. Initially, as a leader of the African National Congress (ANC), Mandela supported armed resistance against the apartheid regime in South Africa after peaceful protests were met with brutal repression. However, during his 27 years of imprisonment, Mandela came to embrace non-violence as a more effective means of achieving lasting peace and equality.

Upon his release from prison in 1990, Mandela worked tirelessly to dismantle the apartheid system through negotiations and reconciliation rather than through violence. His leadership was instrumental in the peaceful transition to a democratic South Africa. Mandela’s commitment to non-violence and reconciliation was exemplified by his efforts to unite a deeply divided nation, which included establishing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission to address the injustices of the past.

Mandela’s approach to non-violence culminated in the peaceful elections of 1994, which saw him become South Africa’s first black president. His legacy gives credence to the power of forgiveness, dialogue, and non-violence in overcoming hatred and division.

The non-violent approaches of Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Nelson Mandela were pivotal in achieving their respective aims. Each leader faced seemingly insurmountable obstacles, yet their commitment to non-violence allowed them to galvanise support, draw international attention to their causes, and ultimately achieve profound social and political change. Their legacies continue to inspire movements for justice and equality around the world, proving that non-violence is not only a moral stance but also an immensely powerful tool for achieving lasting change.

SOME HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES

When carrying out a protest, it is crucial to remember that whatever is destroyed in the process only sets the course of development back. True patriots and responsible citizens do not engage in destruction as a means to build. If individuals genuinely have the nation’s best interests at heart, they will refrain from destroying properties, looting, or inflicting harm on their fellow citizens.

Those who care deeply about their country will not incite trouble, break laws, or leave a trail of destruction in their wake. It brings to mind the story of King Solomon, the wisest man who ever lived. When two women came before him, each claiming to be the mother of a child, Solomon proposed to divide the child into two. The woman who was not the true mother agreed to this plan, while the real mother cried out, begging for the child to be spared, even if it meant giving him to the other woman. Through this, Solomon discerned who the real mother was.

In the same way, the manner in which a protest is conducted reveals the intentions and mindset of those involved. If a protest is carried out with violent fervour, destroying everything in its path, we can quickly discern that those involved may have ulterior motives that extend beyond the general interest of the people. They may be more interested in creating chaos than in pursuing genuine change.

Consider, for example, the recent protests that took place in Nigeria in 2024. Many who observed the events concluded that those who engaged in destruction during the protests did not truly have the country’s interests at heart. Such individuals are destroyers, believing that if they cannot achieve their goals, they must destroy everything in their path—much like the deceitful woman in the story of King Solomon.

Successful protests throughout history have shown that peaceful resistance, rather than violence, is often the most effective path to meaningful change. Take the Civil Rights Movement in the United States, led by figures like Martin Luther King Jr. Through peaceful protests, sit-ins, and marches, they were able to effect lasting change without resorting to violence. The strength of their movement lay in their commitment to justice and equality, not destruction.

Similarly, the Indian independence movement, led by Mahatma Gandhi, embraced the philosophy of non-violent resistance. Despite the enormous pressures and provocations, Gandhi and his followers remained steadfast in their peaceful approach. In the end, it was this unwavering commitment to peace and justice that led to India’s independence from British rule.

Both examples show that the most powerful protests are those rooted in integrity, peace, and a genuine desire to build a better future. Violence, on the other hand, only serves to undermine the cause and alienate the very people whose support is needed to bring about real change. Those who resort to destruction betray the spirit of protest and reveal that their true intentions may not align with the broader goals of the movement.

True patriots understand that to build a nation, one must act with care and responsibility. Protests can be a powerful tool for change, but only when conducted with integrity and a clear focus on the greater good. Destruction, on the other hand, only drags a nation backward and betrays the trust of those who seek genuine progress.

Understand Your Inherent Weakness

When it comes to staging a successful protest, understanding your weaknesses and the limitations of your team is paramount. Before taking any steps, time must be taken to assess and develop strategies to address potential shortcomings. These weaknesses can range from a lack of expertise and poor information dissemination to weak team spirit and an inability to fully pursue the ideologies behind the protest. These are all crucial factors that, if not addressed, could hinder the success of your movement.

Any protest, much like any other project, requires deliberate planning and careful design. Stepping out to challenge a government without preparation is akin to playing a dangerous game. If you fail to identify and address your weaknesses, you are setting yourself up for failure. Awareness of your vulnerabilities allows you to build stronger foundations or implement programs to mitigate these risks. Otherwise, these weaknesses could undermine your very intentions.

A key component of any well-thought-out plan is a solid SWOT analysis – knowing your strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. A protest is not exempt from this rule. Understanding your strengths allows you to leverage them effectively, while recognising your weaknesses gives you the chance to address them before they become fatal flaws. It is also essential to identify opportunities that could be harnessed to enhance your efforts and to be fully aware of the threats that could impede your success.

It is not only important to know your internal strengths and weaknesses, but also to assess the external environment. Is the timing right for your movement? Are the circumstances around you favourable? What type of people are involved, and do they have the commitment and focus needed? These are all factors that will contribute to the success or failure of your protest.

One of the biggest threats to any protest movement is the conservativeness of government. Governments often cling to the status quo to retain power, even if it means perpetuating ideologies that lead to regression. For example, in Nigeria, the immunity granted to presidents and governors has often been abused, obstructing the path to good governance. In this case, the government becomes a formidable force against transformation. Therefore, to counter this, you must have superior strategies – not brute force, but intelligence, knowledge, research, and strong communication with the grassroots.

The term “soul force” was famously used by Mahatma Gandhi and later Martin Luther King Jr. to describe the power of nonviolent resistance. This high level of intelligence, combined with soul force, can be more effective than any physical force in bringing about change. If you can consistently build upon your strengths and reduce the impact of your weaknesses through deliberate oversight, success is within reach.

However, if a community rises against bad governance without first putting its own house in order, it is doomed to failure. Such a movement will crumble, and its members will become, as Chief Obafemi Awolowo so aptly put it, “an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” The lesson here is clear: no protest can succeed without unity and proper organisation. One thousand people protesting in different directions will achieve nothing; they will be defeated a thousand times over.

Martin Luther King Jr. echoed this sentiment when he said, “Those who love peace must learn to organise as effectively as those who love war.” Change does not come simply by demanding it; it requires intentionality, focus, and a clear vision of what you want to achieve. This is why the number of people involved in a protest is not as important as the quality of their determination and the clarity of their aspirations.

As George Washington, the first President of the United States, once said, “Discipline is the soul of an army. It makes small numbers formidable; procures success to the weak, and esteem to all.” A small group of people who know what they are doing can make a significant difference. Once the leaders of a protest possess the right knowledge and everyone is focused, it is only a matter of time before the movement galvanises an entire nation to support the cause. The strength of a protest lies not in the number of participants, but in their discipline, focus, and ability to organise effectively.

Creating Your World

The most powerful form of protest that citizens can engage in is during the election season itself. This involves not only voting but actively participating in the discovery, nomination, and sponsorship of candidates with proven integrity and a track record of service. These candidates should be held to clear terms and conditions before the election, ensuring they are accountable to the people, not to hidden agendas.

However, what we see today in Nigeria, and indeed in many other African countries, is a citizenry that lacks the patience and willpower to shape its own leaders. The saying goes, “What you don’t create, you cannot control.” This is evident in the way many of the politicians we have today were crafted by powerful godfathers and cabals. These politicians are beholden to their creators, taking orders from them while treating the electorate as mere rubber stamps during elections.

It is disheartening to see citizens fighting or arguing over politicians, forgetting that most are cut from the same cloth. Whether we vote for one party or another, we often end up voting for candidates who are products of the same political entrepreneurs. These figures belong to the same ruling class, emerging from the same school of thought, and are loyal to the same godfathers and sponsors.

Take the case of Nigeria’s political landscape, for example. The system is largely under the control of individuals and groups who have little to no genuine concern for the common man. Their interests lie in maintaining the status quo, preserving their power, and ensuring their continued dominance over the political arena. The recent elections in Nigeria illustrate this point vividly, where despite the fervent desires of the populace for change, the outcomes were largely determined by the influence of these entrenched powers on divided citizens.

Consider the historical protests in other parts of the world, such as the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. The success of these protests was not merely in the numbers of people involved, but in the clarity of their demands and the strategic, sustained pressure they applied to the political system. Similarly, in South Africa, the fight against apartheid succeeded not just because of mass mobilisation, but because the people remained united, resolute, and clear in their objective to dismantle a deeply entrenched system of racial injustice.

For real change to happen, citizens must take ownership of the political process. This means being active before, during, and after elections, ensuring that those who seek to represent them are truly accountable. Without this, the cycle of disappointment and disenfranchisement will continue, with power remaining in the hands of those who are indifferent to the needs of the people. The populace must realise that the power to change the political landscape lies within their collective hands, and it is only by exercising this power wisely and persistently that true progress can be achieved.

For if you don’t put your house in order, you cannot win the external war.

Wrapping It Up

As we look to the future, it’s crucial that we shift our approach to how we hold politicians accountable. Rather than seeking personal favours or billing them for individual needs, we must establish performance yardsticks to measure their effectiveness. If we continue to demand personal benefits, politicians will be incentivised to siphon off our common resources—not just enough to satisfy our immediate requests, but also to secure their own wealth. This vicious cycle only deepens corruption and weakens the integrity of our governance.

It is essential to recognise that it is not the duty of politicians to address our personal needs. As election seasons approach, we must exercise discipline and present the broader needs of our communities and society as a whole, focusing on the common good. This shift in focus will help create a more equitable society where public resources are allocated for the benefit of all, rather than a select few.

Moreover, we must invest in raising and supporting our own candidates—individuals who are closely aligned with our values and committed to serving the public interest. When we help elevate a candidate, they become accountable to us. They will know that if they fail to perform, we have the power to hold them accountable. A candidate who rises to power through our support will continue to rely on that support to sustain their position, as our votes become the source of their strength. With this in mind, it is time to consider the sponsorship of candidates into elected offices, ensuring that those who represent us are genuinely committed to our collective welfare.

Waking up every four years to protest against a government we had no hand in creating is akin to a child throwing a tantrum, hoping to be heard. True change requires more than sporadic outbursts of dissatisfaction; it demands a structured system for the emergence of our leaders. We must be vigilant to ensure that this system is not hijacked by those with selfish interests.

John Philpot Curran, an Irish lawyer and politician, famously said, “The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt.” This timeless quote, often paraphrased as “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty,” reminds us that freedom is not guaranteed—it must be actively protected. Many of us are merely spectators in the political theatre, observing events without becoming true stakeholders. Until we assume our role as stakeholders, our voices will carry little weight in the candidacies of politicians.

In the Western world, citizens hold power over their politicians because they fund their campaigns and elections. This financial support gives them a strong voice when their candidate wins.

As of the 2024 election season in America, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are heavily reliant on grassroots and high-dollar donations from the masses to fuel their campaigns. They have significant support from the base. This means that regular citizens fund campaigns in the advance societies of the world.

In contrast, in many developing nations, citizens often take from their politicians, thereby selling their birthright and becoming subservient to these leaders. This dynamic renders them voiceless, and their protests are often ineffective. As a people, we must recognise that our tendency to be easily swayed by inducements is a significant barrier to meaningful change.

The most important task before us is to embrace a new kind of protest—one that begins with changing ourselves and spreading that spirit of transformation throughout our communities. When we do this, we will not only be capable of influencing the political process but also of achieving the true and lasting change that we so desperately seek.

Vices: The Easy Tool for Dividing a Society

In any society plagued by widespread vices, it becomes relatively easy for leaders to divide the populace. By polarising the ranks of citizens, a leader can maintain control, exploiting these divisions to prolong their hold on power. As long as the people remain unaware of their collective ability to drive transformation, the burden of change will continue to rest heavily on their shoulders.

However, one of the most challenging tasks for many of us is self-discipline. Instead of reforming our ways and thoughts, we often seek to compensate by demanding changes from our surroundings. But real, durable change begins with us as individuals. Taking shortcuts may seem convenient, but they are only temporary solutions.

The Nigerian Protest: Application of Caution

A poignant example of this can be observed in the recent protests against bad governance in Nigeria. Many citizens, who were ostensibly fighting for good leadership, ended up engaging in behaviour that contradicted the very principles they claimed to uphold. The protests revealed a stark irony: citizens ransacking government quarters and looting shops, while claiming to fight for a better government. This scenario was akin to the kettle calling the pot black, exposing a deeper societal problem.

Furthermore, many of the protest sponsors had ulterior motives. Their contributions were not driven by a genuine desire to improve Nigeria but rather by their distance from central power. These sponsors were more interested in manipulating public sentiment to win favour and advance their own agendas, which might have been even more sinister than those of the incumbent government.

The Need for a Dual Campaign: Bad Government and Bad Citizenship

When we protest against bad governance and corrupt leadership, it is imperative that we simultaneously campaign against bad citizenship. If we neglect this, we risk merely fuelling revolutions that could result in outcomes even worse than the situations we are protesting against. Consider this: if a person lacking in values leads a successful revolution and wins the hearts of the people, the cycle of poor governance will persist.

If a bad citizen fights the battle and deposes a corrupt government, that same bad citizen is likely to become a corrupt leader. In essence, bad citizens breed bad leaders—it’s a simple yet profound truth. We must acknowledge that until we come to terms with this reality, our nation will continue to stagnate, making no real progress, much like the Yoruba adage: “when you throw a knife up several times, it will always land on its flat side.”

Overhauling Leadership Requires Overhauling Values

If we are serious about overhauling the leadership of our country, we must also overhaul the values of its citizens. This is where we need true statesmen and elders, those who genuinely care about the nation’s welfare, to speak with one voice. These leaders must hold both the government and citizens accountable, guiding us towards a new direction for our country.

Unfortunately, the leaders we have raised in recent times have proven to be largely helpless and clueless. Many seem to lack the understanding, or perhaps the will, to enforce the changes we need. Their actions are often hindered by primordial interests and prejudices, preventing them from taking decisive steps for the common good.

In many instances, we have succeeded only in raising sectional leaders as our presidents or heads of state. This explains why so many of them are more concerned with their ethnic or religious affiliations than with the welfare of the entire nation.

The Bottom Line

The purpose of this discussion is to prepare the average Nigerian citizen to hold themselves to a higher standard—one that is above reproach. Those who seek to fight for good governance must also strive to be beyond reproach. For he that goes to equity must go with clean hands.

On this basis, future leaders of protests or movements for transformation must take it upon themselves to communicate clearly with their followers. They must ensure that everyone involved understands the true purpose of the cause and the importance of maintaining unity. Only by doing so can we hope to achieve the meaningful and lasting change that we so desperately need.

How We Got Here

There is a deeply ingrained culture that perpetuates bad governance, and it is crucial to understand how this has taken root. One of the key factors is our collective tendency to accept gifts or incentives before offering our support to political aspirants during elections. This behaviour is not limited to the ordinary citizen; it extends to the wealthy, influential, and even many religious leaders. We have developed a preference for immediate rewards, often without considering the long-term consequences of our actions, which can result in the mortgaging of our future.

This attitude permeates every sector of our society, becoming a tool for politicians to keep our nation in a state of perpetual dependency. We, as a people, have become easily swayed by monetary incentives. As a result, the real protest we should be undertaking is against our own propensity for instant gratification—our unrestrained desire to be bribed before we fulfil our civic duties. This nature of ours, which rallies support for those who will ultimately enslave us once money has exchanged hands, is at the root of our ongoing struggles.

The Power of Gifts

One of the most powerful laws of influence is the giving of gifts. When you accept a gift from someone, you become more inclined to support or fulfil the requests of the giver. However, not every gift is good or healthy. Consider this analogy: when a woman repeatedly accepts gifts from a man, she may unknowingly become beholden to him, feeling obligated to comply with his wishes.

In Maximum Influence, by Kurt W. Mortensen he discusses how gifting can serve as a powerful tool in persuasion. He elaborates on the principle of reciprocity, which states that when someone receives something, they feel a natural obligation to return the favour. This psychological phenomenon can be used to influence behaviour such as the case with vote buying, as people often feel compelled to say “yes” to a request after they have received a gift, even if the value of the gift is relatively small.

Mortensen explains that gifts, when given with sincerity, can create a sense of goodwill and trust, making the recipient more likely to be receptive to persuasion. However, the power of this technique lies in its subtlety and in ensuring the recipient does not feel manipulated.

Similarly, when we accept money from politicians before an election, whether knowingly or unknowingly, we effectively sell our souls to them. We end up doing their bidding and following their direction, as we fall under their influence and control. At the end, we become weakened to protest against their misdeeds.

Accepting gifts without restraint makes you lose control.

The Consequences of Early Gratification

Think about this scenario: before an election, you name your price and inform a politician of the amount required to secure your support or vote. Desperate not to lose the election, the politician may go to great lengths, even selling assets, to meet your demand. By engaging in such transactions, we strip the politician of their conscience and moral compass, making them less likely to be considerate towards us. Subconsciously, the politician begins to believe that money can buy anything, including your loyalty. When such politicians view citizens, they see individuals who can be bought, leading them to lose respect and kindness for the very people they are meant to serve.

In essence, we reap what we sow. We exploit politicians before the election, and they, in turn, exploit us after the election. Instead of focusing solely on the fruits of this system, we must first examine the seeds we have planted.

The Cost of Corruption

Before an election, everyone is eager to demand payment from aspirants. Few care about the source of the money, and this disregard is not limited to ordinary citizens; it also includes our elders and supposed religious leaders. Nothing remains hidden from the public eye.

I recall the case of a young man who was genuinely interested in representing his people at the National Assembly. I witnessed firsthand how every group he visited during his campaign expected monetary contributions from him. The situation was so dire that some groups even fought and insisted on the amount he should give. Despite giving so much, the young man still lost the election to the highest bidder.

The politician who eventually won the election will, by all means, resort to stealing or embezzling public funds to recoup the expenses incurred during the campaign. This vicious cycle continues because we have allowed it to thrive.

This chapter delves into two critical components of effective governance: the citizens and the leaders. It is often said that these two groups are at constant loggerheads, each blaming the other for the dire state of the nation. Citizens point fingers at corrupt leaders, while leaders decry the uncooperative nature of the populace. The truth, however, is that both sides are responsible for the current situation. Citizens and leaders are like the two sides of a coin; if one side is defaced, the value of the entire coin is compromised. In the same way, no matter how good one side of the coin may be, the nation’s potential is lost if the other side is marred. Therefore, to build a great nation, we must undertake a comprehensive overhaul of our values, both as citizens and as leaders. Bad leadership inevitably damages the nation, just as bad citizens inevitably raise a poor crop of future leaders.

Leaders and Citizens Share Similar Traits

One of the most troubling aspects of our national predicament is the striking similarity in character between the leaders and the citizens. In my years of research into the problems plaguing our country, I have discovered that the same mindset that pervades among the citizens is often magnified in our leaders. This is not surprising; after all, our leaders are drawn from the same pool as our citizens.

Take, for example, the governance of grassroots organisations such as landlord associations, cooperatives, and religious bodies. Many of these groups are run with the same level of corruption and mismanagement that we see at the national and state levels. How often have we witnessed the assets of an association being squandered by its executives, or funds being misappropriated for personal gain? If such a local leader were to rise to a national position, it is almost certain that they would continue their pattern of looting and mismanagement on a larger scale.

The saying, “As a leader, so the people,” rings true. A populace that values justice and integrity will naturally expel bad leadership because the environment will not tolerate it. Conversely, when citizens are complicit or apathetic, leaders feel emboldened to act with impunity.

The Importance of Citizen Responsibility

One cannot help but notice that most of those who criticise the government often do so because they have not yet had the opportunity to partake in the same corrupt practices. The fundamental pathway to national transformation lies not in reckless protests, as we have often seen, but in the cultivation of a virtuous lifestyle among citizens. In many advanced nations, transparency, trust, and responsibility are common denominators, even among the general populace. These values serve as a watchdog for leaders, who know they will be held accountable by an informed and engaged citizenry.

On the other hand, when a leader knows that citizens are merely pretending to care about integrity, they will brazenly commit acts of corruption, confident that they will find allies among the people who will protect them. The character of the citizenry, therefore, plays a crucial role in determining whether leaders will control their appetites or indulge their greed. When leaders know they can get away with poor performance, they will relax. But when they know they are under constant scrutiny, they will be compelled to perform.

The Corporate Experience: A Microcosm of National Governance

Many years ago, while working in a corporate organisation, I encountered a similar scenario. My subordinates frequently gave excuses for why we could not achieve the desired results. Being new to the system, I initially accepted these excuses, and as a result, our performance continued to decline. However, when the higher-ups began to focus on my department, I realised that I needed to scrutinise and demand better results. Within a year, we moved from the bottom of the performance chart to become one of the best-performing plants in Sub-Saharan Africa. The lesson here is that virtually everyone can perform at an exceptional level when challenged. Yet, we often see African leaders, educated in some of the best universities in the world, returning home to deliver subpar results. This is because no one challenges them to perform. When they relax, everything around them relaxes, and the entire nation reflects their weaknesses.

The Root of the Problem: A Cultural and Mindset Deficiency

The problems we face as a nation are not solely the fault of our leaders or citizens. Instead, they stem from a cultural deficiency and mindset that stifle progress and keep us mired in mediocrity. Until we begin to challenge not just our leaders, but also one another, to aspire to excellence and high performance, our output will continue to be an embarrassment. Changing the leaders without addressing the root causes will only result in the same cycle repeating itself. New leaders, raised from among the same citizens, will soon fall into the same patterns of corruption and inefficiency.

My dream is that excellence becomes the new normal, inspiring individuals and communities to strive for the highest standards in every endeavour. I envision a world where dedication, integrity, and innovation are not just aspirations but everyday practices, driving us to achieve extraordinary results. This shift would cultivate a culture of continuous improvement, where everyone is empowered to contribute their best, fostering an environment that celebrates success and uplifts those around us. In this reality, excellence would not only be expected but embraced as a shared value, paving the way for a brighter future for all.

A Case Study: The Perils of Unchecked Authority

Years ago, there was a deputy director in a government office who was widely regarded as a good and approachable person. Together with her junior colleagues, she would criticise the director, believing that the director was not accommodating enough towards subordinates. However, when the director retired and the deputy director took over, she quickly became worse than her predecessor. This is a common occurrence: individuals who once railed against the vices of their leaders often fall into the same behaviours once they assume power.

The Real Focus: Values, Structures, and Laws

Before we protest or seek to uproot bad leaders, we must ask ourselves some crucial questions: Are our problems really caused by our leaders, or are they a result of the values, structures, and laws that underpin our governance? If we do not understand what we are fighting against, the same loopholes that allowed the rise of our current leaders will overwhelm any new leaders we put in place. The perpetual cycle of bad leadership is rooted in fundamental issues that we must address before we can hope to bring about real change. If we fail to do this, even the best-intentioned leaders will soon fall into the same patterns, and we will find ourselves back where we started.

The path to effective governance requires a transformation not just of our leaders, but of our citizens as well. It demands a reevaluation of our values, the implementation of robust structures, and the enforcement of laws that promote accountability at all levels. Only then can we hope to break free from the cycle of mediocrity and build a nation that truly reflects our highest aspirations.

A Lesson from the Olympics

The Olympic Games in Paris 2024 have provided us with a striking lesson on the impact of environment, leadership, and governance on success. Of the 88 Nigerian athletes (representing more than two hundred million Nigerians) who travelled to compete, not a single medal was won. In stark contrast, a handful of Nigerians competing on behalf of other countries were able to secure four medals. This disparity is not merely coincidental but is indicative of a deeper, systemic issue.

It is hard to ignore the influence of poor governance and leadership on the performance of the citizens and by extension the athletes. The preparations that should have been made over the past two, three, or even four years were evidently lacking. This neglect manifested itself clearly in the results at the Olympics. When athletes are not provided with the necessary resources, training, and support, their performance inevitably suffers.

The failures at the Olympics are a microcosm of the broader challenges facing our nation. Poor leadership and ineffective governance do not just affect politics; they permeate every aspect of society, including sports. This is why we must re-evaluate and reposition our national narrative. To foster excellence and productivity, we must cultivate an environment that nurtures hard work, talent and potential.

The lesson from the Olympics is clear. The few Nigerians in the diaspora who managed to win medals did so not because they possess superior genes, but because they were nurtured in environments that supported their growth and excellence. Conversely, the performance of those at home highlights how a stifling, under-resourced environment can suppress even the greatest potential. The environment that nurtures a man will hugely determine who he becomes.

To move forward, we must address these systemic issues. It is not enough to merely participate in global competitions; we must create conditions where our citizens can excel, both at home and abroad. This requires a collective effort to improve governance, invest in infrastructure, and create a society where excellence is not the exception, but the norm. Only then can we hope to see the true potential of our nation realised on the global stage.

Elements of a Successful and Sustainable Protest

1. Representation of the Masses’ Needs

For a protest to be deemed successful, whether in the immediate or long term, it must capture and reflect the genuine needs and desires of the general populace. A protest should not merely be a gathering of individuals with a superficial understanding of the cause or a vague agenda. Instead, it must be rooted in a clear and unified demand that resonates with the masses. Consider the civil rights movements of the 1960s, where the call for equality, justice, and an end to racial segregation was a powerful and unifying force. Everyone involved knew precisely what they were fighting for, and this clarity of purpose was instrumental in driving change. Protests that lack this shared understanding often fizzle out or become co-opted by fringe elements, rendering them ineffective.

2. Effective Communication and Messaging

A sustainable and impactful protest must have a clear message that is effectively communicated across all available media platforms. The success of any movement largely depends on its ability to convey its demands and the underlying reasons for those demands to a broad audience. For instance, the use of social media during the Arab Spring played a crucial role in galvanising support and spreading the message of the protests globally. In contrast, a protest with poorly communicated objectives risks being misunderstood or ignored by both the public and those in power. To ensure the longevity and impact of a protest, its organisers must utilise all available communication channels—traditional media, social media, public forums, and more—to reach as many people as possible and to articulate their demands clearly and persuasively.

3. Identification and Accountability

For a protest to be truly sustainable and successful, those participating must be willing to stand behind their cause openly. A faceless protest, where the participants remain anonymous or hidden, is less likely to garner public support or achieve its goals. When individuals are committed to a just cause, there should be no fear in stepping forward and being recognised as part of the movement. Consider the suffragette movement in the United Kingdom, where women bravely identified themselves as campaigners for the right to vote, despite the risks. Their visibility and courage were crucial to their eventual success. If you believe in the righteousness of your cause, there is no need to hide. Being identified not only lends credibility to the protest but also fosters a sense of accountability among participants. It shows the public and those in power that the movement is serious, organised, and committed to its objectives.

4. A Protest Should Open Doors for Negotiation and Dialogue

A truly effective protest does not merely disrupt; it creates a platform for meaningful negotiation and dialogue. It should be structured in a way that compels policymakers to engage with the issues at hand. For example, the Civil Rights Movement in the United States, led by figures like Martin Luther King Jr., was not just about marching in the streets; it was about creating a situation where the government had no choice but to sit down and negotiate with the protestors. The Birmingham Campaign in 1963, which strategically targeted the city’s segregation laws, forced leaders to come to the table, resulting in significant civil rights advancements. In any protest, it is crucial to present clear demands and be prepared to discuss and bargain for practical solutions. The ability to engage in constructive dialogue is often what transforms a protest from a moment of public dissent into a catalyst for lasting change.

5. A Successful Protest is a Long-Term Commitment

One of the most important things to understand about successful protests is that they are not short-term events. Achieving meaningful change often requires sustained effort over a long period. The anti-apartheid movement in South Africa, for instance, spanned decades, with activists facing immense challenges, including imprisonment and violence. Despite these obstacles, they remained committed to their cause, ultimately leading to the dismantling of the apartheid system. Similarly, the Suffragette movement in the United Kingdom took years of relentless campaigning before women were granted the right to vote. Protesters must be prepared for a long-term struggle, understanding that real change often requires persistent effort, strategic planning, and resilience in the face of setbacks. Patience and perseverance are essential, as the path to justice is rarely straightforward or quick.

6. A Worthwhile Protest Must Be Scalable and Continuously Reviewed

For a protest to achieve its full potential, it must be scalable and open to continuous review and adaptation. This means that as the protest evolves, it should be capable of expanding its reach, both in terms of participants and the issues it addresses. For example, the environmental movement has grown from a small, niche concern to a global campaign involving millions of people and covering a wide range of issues, from climate change to biodiversity. The initial protests against industrial pollution have been scaled up to address broader concerns about sustainability and global environmental justice. To achieve this, organisers must constantly review their strategies, reassess their goals, and ensure that they are addressing the most pressing issues of the time. This adaptability allows the protest to remain relevant and effective, even as the political landscape changes. By expanding the scope of the protest and including a broader range of issues and voices, the movement can build momentum and create a more substantial impact.

In summary, a successful protest is one that is rooted in the genuine needs of the masses, effectively communicates its message, and is led by individuals who are willing to stand up and be counted. Without these elements, protests risk becoming disorganised, misunderstood, or simply ineffective.

These elements illustrate that a successful protest requires more than just a moment of public outcry; it demands strategic planning, sustained effort, and a commitment to dialogue and adaptation. When these elements are in place, a protest can move beyond mere expression of dissent and become a powerful force for social change.